Intelligence · Strategy
Strategy & adversarial review
Strategy in OpenLegal is a structured argument, not a suggestion engine. Specialist roles debate and red-team; options, war games, and contingencies emerge — and a human holds the final call.
The strategy pipeline
Council synthesis
Specialist roles — each representing a perspective — debate the matter and synthesize a position.
Adversarial review
An adversarial pass attacks the synthesis, exposing assumptions and weak spots before they reach you.
Strategy work items
Options are structured, sourced, and prioritized with dependencies.
Play it forward
War-game scenarios test contingencies and adversarial responses before any action is chosen.
Human gate
Strategy output lands at an approvals surface — terminal, browser, or API — and stops there.
Design principles
Second opinions by design
Debate and red-team are built into the loop, so a single-model blind spot is an explicit review target.
Contingencies, not guarantees
War games produce options and fallbacks — the system never promises that an outcome will happen.
You remain the decision
No strategy item executes autonomously. Approval is a first-class gate, not an afterthought.